首页> 外文OA文献 >Book Availability Revisited: Turnaround Time for Recalls versus Interlibrary Loans
【2h】

Book Availability Revisited: Turnaround Time for Recalls versus Interlibrary Loans

机译:再谈书籍的可用性:召回与馆际互借的周转时间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Librarians typically view interlibrary loan (ILL) as a means of providing access to items not owned by the local institution. However, they are less likely to explore ILL’s potential in providing timely access to items locally owned, but temporarily unavailable, particularly in the case of monographs in circulation. In a two­part study, the authors test the as­ sumption that, on average, locally owned books that a patron finds un­ available (due to checkout) can be obtained more quickly via recall than via ILL. Phase 1 of this study establishes an average turnaround time for circulation recalls in a large academic library for comparison with well­ established turnaround times for ILL borrowing transactions. In Phase 2, a more rigorous paired study of recalls and ILL compares the ability of each system to handle identical requests in real time. Results demon­ strate that, under some circumstances, ILL provides a reasonable alter­ native to the internal recall process. The findings also underscore the need for more holistic, interservice models for improving not just ac­ cess, but also the timeliness of access, to monograph collections.
机译:图书馆员通常将馆际互借(ILL)视为提供对本地机构不拥有的物品的访问的一种方式。但是,他们不太可能发掘ILL的潜力,以便及时获取本地拥有但暂时不可用的物品,特别是在流通的专着的情况下。在一个由两部分组成的研究中,作者测试了这样的假设:平均而言,通过召回比通过ILL更快地获得顾客发现(由于结帐)不可用的本地拥有书籍。本研究的第1阶段为大型大学图书馆的流通召回确定了平均周转时间,以便与ILL借贷交易的周转时间建立良好的比较。在阶段2中,对召回和ILL进行更严格的配对研究,比较了每个系统实时处理相同请求的能力。结果表明,在某些情况下,ILL为内部召回流程提供了合理的替代方法。这些发现还强调了需要更全面,跨部门的模型来改善访问量和及时性,以提高专着的收藏价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号